Is radiocarbon dating accuracy

An Objective Look at Radiocarbon Dating

Scientists who study organic materials from the past 55, years may see some changes in their data. By Megan I. More than 3, years ago a catastrophic volcanic eruption struck ancient Thera, known today as the Greek island of Santorini. Ash and pumice rained across the Mediterranean, and tsunami waves rolled onto faraway shores in Crete. In the s archaeologists on Santorini uncovered a Minoan settlement frozen in time, with vibrant wall frescoes decorating multistory houses, all buried by volcanic debris. The eruption was one of the most powerful volcanic explosions of the past 10, years and a crucial time point of the Mediterranean Bronze Age. It is also a major area of controversy in archaeology; researchers have argued for decades over the date of this cataclysm.

REGISTER TO VIEW

Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.

REGISTER TO VIEW

Aerial view of Tel Megiddo, a site in which radiocarbon dating is now frequently used to date archaeological levels and features. In short, radiocarbon dating is a technique to measure the amount of carbon 14 C14 isotope present in an organic sample a seed, bone, or even piece of wood to estimate how long ago that sample died or began to decompose. This is one of the most powerful methods of establishing an absolute chronology for an archaeological stratum or artifact and is a necessary tool for nearly all archaeologists.

REGISTER TO VIEW

BIBLE HISTORY DAILY

I n a interview with the Albright Institute, Prof. Israel Finkelstein extolled the merits of radiocarbon dating in archaeology. According to this theory, the monumental Iron iia structures traditionally dated to the reigns of David and Solomon in the early 10th century b.

REGISTER TO VIEW

REGISTER TO VIEW